Aero helmet advantage
I'm pretty sure I've seen this talked about here in the past, but can't find a real good thread/reference to support the case for an aero helmet at slower speads.
I bring this up because the conventional wisdom among many local triathletes I know seems to be that you need to be going over 20 mph on the bike for an aero helmet to really make a difference. I know this has been disputed here - while at slower speeds the percentage difference in wind resistance will be less, you have a longer time on the bike to make that smaller percentage expressed. So the absolute time difference is still there (and similar?) reguardless of speed.
I understand that - but it would be nice to have a reference that supports the claim. I need to rebut the local conventional wisdom, but need supporting documentation! Also, how many minutes are we talking about for HIM and IM races?
Thanks all!
Comments
http://gearwestbike.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/who-said-you-are-too-slow-for-an-aero-improvement/
http://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/article/how-aero-is-aero-19273/
Rudy has some stuff on their site: http://www.rudyproject.com/products/helmets/wingspan.html
Looks like some good links towards the bottom of the page: http://www.livestrong.com/article/269269-effectiveness-of-aero-bicycle-helmets/
http://www.cervelo.com/en/engineering/thinking-and-processes/slow-vs-fast-riders.html
It's not a question of opinion. It's a question of math.