FTP/VDot Goal Question
Hi I'm looking for some guidance on my racing goals for this season.
Historyically;
I have one race. IMMT 12:40 (1:07 swim, 6:59 Bike, 4:18 run). I left some on the table on the bike for fear of blowing my run along with two flat tires in the first hour. On the run I had an issue too that added about 10mins. Overall under better circumstances I could have finished (very slightly) under 12 hours I think.
My goal this year for IMMT 2014 is 1:05 swim, 6:00 bike, 3:30 run. I'd like to come in under 11hrs. I'm not sure if I'm being unrealistic. Looking for some feedback.
I calculated my VDOt goal to be 44.55 for a 3:30 marathon. Last year my VDot was 42 for IMMT. My FTP was 251 if I tested correctly. I had some issues with testing in the wrong environment.
Overall last year I had some bad advise. I came to EN late in the season, so this is my first OS and I want to do it right this year. Your input would be appreciated! What should I be aiming for this year?
Thanks!
Comments
Have you submitted your numbers to us via the Heads/Tails thread here?
http://members.endurancenation.us/Forums/tabid/57/aft/13709/Default.aspx
The short answer is to do the work, focus on consistency and let the gains come. Our historical FTP gain in the OS is about 10%.
Moving this thread to the Power and Pace forum where you'll get more feedback.
Follow the plan. Do the work. Crush the OS but follow the plan. Test, do work. Retest, repeat. In the late spring/early summer, this will all start to come together and will be solidified in your race rehearsals.
Anything is possible, so aim high and go get it. But if you want real feedback on your 'hypotheticals':
Swim - who knows... 2 mins is the difference in swimming straighter or not.
Bike - with no flats and great execution, you're half way there. Your FTP will be higher. Can you get your weight down? 6hrs flat 'should' definitely be doable.
Run - that is a lofty goal. Certainly an achievable one and a goal I have been chasing for yrs. That vDot looks like it produces a standalone marathon around that time. An IM marathon is a different beast. If you're within 20-30 mins of your standalone marathon time in an IM after a 6 hr bike, you likely had great execution.
But ignore everything I just said and get to work. (And Welcome to da Haus)
Some practical advice:
Uh, I've been trawling thru the EN forums and wiki today, pulling out threads and articles about how to succeed at the IM marathon, in hopes of firing up a new thread on that topic. Seems like AFTER the IM season is a good time to do that, so as not to get in anyone's head in the build-up to a race. I guess I'll have to tell the IM Coz, and anyone racing Down Under in Dec to avert their eyes.
Topics I'm interested in include how to incorporate into routine workouts the mental training needed to "not slow down" on race day; learning how to correlate RPE, HR,and pace; using HR and RPE to adjust pace for environmental factors such as hills and heat; and how to put it all together on race day.
But specific to this query, I'll just copy from my Missoula Marathon race report; while this was a stand alone marathon, it's exactly the same for an IM race - you're just going slower (emphasis added, and edited slightly):
"...I started out... thinking that if I were properly trained, and if I were properly pacing myself, the race should *feel* (RPE) the same from start to finish. My great insight (one I’m sure every successful racer gets) is that the longer the race goes on, the harder it feels. Evading or delaying that feeling means one is not racing to one’s full potential. There are two other key steps needed to get to that potential: feeding the engine properly, and pacing steadily. So drinking more than you need at the start, and feeling is if you are running “stupid slow” at the start are key. Then, it’s like Chinese water torture . With every mile, every step, it feels a little harder. From miles 1-8, it feels like your long run pace. From miles 9-16, it’s like one’s “marathon pace”. From 17-22, like half marathon pace, 22-24 like a 10K would feel, and then the last two ... it’s like a 5k, or even harder by mile 26. Even though you're going at the exact same speed."
Amazing feedback everyone! gives me the freedom to just work hard without "thinking" too much, which I usually do! I'm very encouraged.
@Rich, no I haven't added my numbers to the list because I was injured during the first week of OS during testing. I did my test despite not feeling great. I didn't realize how injured I was until later. My FTP was something like 212, so either I had a huge drop since IMMT, or it was because I was testing indoors vs my FTP of 251 (outdoors up hill), or being injured I couldn't put in the full effort, or a combination
turns out I had a pinched femoral nerve, so I couldn't do the run test at all. since then I'm feeling good but out of country without access to my power meter and been doing my OS work on a spin bike using HR and RPE. I won't be able to retest for at least another week, or I'll wait until the first test week in the OS.
As for the run test, I'm embarrassed to say that I have a real hard time putting in such a big effort without the motivation of a race. I tried to do it last week and pushed too hard and bailed early. Maybe I'm still not 100%. Not sure.
---Ann.
I will also add to this thread that while FTP is a great metric, racing smart can also make a huge difference. By smart I mean the EN way of easy up the hills, hard down, staying in aero (and having a good aero setup), etc. I did multiple rides of the IMWI course in training with my overall Pnorm never fluctuating more than 5 watts between rides, but with time differences of 15-20 minutes just by riding smart to get the most out of every watt.
But I really do need to work on my bike! That's my project for this season. As a small person, my FTP is pathetic. And if watts/kg is the goal, I only have watts to work with. In reference to the Watts/Kg being a cruel witch thread - she's especially cruel when you only weigh 115 lbs and dropping kgs is not an option!
---Ann.