Home General Training Discussions

Questions re: changes to OS vo2 bike sets

Noticed that in the INT, the default interval switched from 1' to 1.5' minutes.  So if we do 6 x 1.5 (1.5), that's 9 min.  Is there a training difference between that and 1' ON and one OFF for 9 minutes?  (The reason being that last year, I used the Sufferfest's revolver to pretty good effect as I built up to finishing the whole thing.)  Or is the idea to build up to 4x4 or 5x4 rather than 16x1?     Just curious.

Comments

  • Chris nearing the end of NOS now I will say oh yes there is a difference. Those 1.5 seems to be 1.5 hours each versus 1.0 minutes
  • I have done Vo2 workouts from 30"/30" to 2'/2'.  The longer intervals definitely tax my system more (harder workout) given the same amount of work time.  I always try to work up to longer intervals, but never beyond 2-2.5' I just can't handle the work load and get in the next day workout.  The advance plan has 2' segments for a reason, helping boost your fitness.  You don't want to blow up and not get in all the intervals. 

    How was your Vo2 5' test and your FTP test? 

    Gordon

  • Chris,

    I also found this in the OS best practices document in the wiki:

    "The VO2 work feels really easy compared to the Z4/FTP work, can I do more?

    VO2 is an integral component of the OS phase of your training plan. That said, it is not the sole focus of that segment of your plan, or of any part of your season. The goal even during this VO2 phase is to have you continue to improve your threshold. As such do the work that is listed within your training plan but do not exceed the time listed for that VO2 work. If you have extra energy or time on the trainer, simply extend your ride by pushing 85% of threshold power or riding in Zone Three."



    Gordon

  • You'd have to ask the coaches why they made the switch. I speculate it was based on feedback and the desire to make it *just* hard enough to wear you out by the end of the wko, but not so hard you can't bounce back within 36-48 hours. This is the first year I am doing Int OS, as opposed to the advanced. Part of that is age, part is slowing to over 11 hours for my IM time, and part was looking at the 2 vs 1.5 min intervals. 1.5 is right on the border line of what I can handle.

    The training effect depends on where you are starting from. For some of us, 30 sec intervals is long enough to trigger improvements. For others, it may be 2-2.5 minutes. But doing 4 or 5 min intervals wouldn't make sense, as VO2 is supposed to represent what one can do for ONE interval all out for five minutes.
  • 1.5' vs 1' made a huge difference at the onset for me. But, wait till you get to the 5' intervals....whoa!
  • @ Gordon--

    A spectacular failure.  I will either retest tonight, or just guesstimate the intervals.

     I've been training w/power for a few years, so I know what FTP is supposed to feel like, and I may try to just wing a ballpark based on what I know my LTHR is combined with a good sense of RPE and the power numbers.  But I am out of shape at the moment--clearly.  Got 10 min into the twenty and exploded.   Still, though, my legs feel a little stronger today than they did on Tuesday.  (Drip, drip, drip).

  • Chris,

    In the past before the 5' / 20' test we used 1.2X your FTP for VO2 intervals.  This maybe a good place to start.  If your ceiling (FTP) is closing in on your Roof (Vo2) then 1.2 might be pretty hard and you will know it as you get deeper in to the 6X1.5.  If you've got a good idea of your FTP then this could help. 

    The Vo2 workouts are tough and make sure you are not extimating you FTP too high and thus pusing up Vo2 workouts.  This is a recipe for needing down time a few weeks in to the OS.  If you are not confident about your FPT estimate then I'd consider a retest.

    Gordon  

  • last night's effort went well--6x1.5 at 1.2-1.23 IF, so I think the numbers were right.  Held power, and negative split the intervals.  Breathing hard and slightly lightheaded after the last one.  Backing out of those numbers (all ints were in a 7w range), I'd put FTP at about 185-190, deduct 5 percent and try 2x20 (or 12, or whatever) at 180 or better--see how that goes.  The weekend calls for a 2x12, plus tempo work.


  • Posted By Chris Mohr on 10 Jan 2014 07:27 AM

    last night's effort went well--6x1.5 at 1.2-1.23 IF, so I think the numbers were right.  Held power, and negative split the intervals.  Breathing hard and slightly lightheaded after the last one.  Backing out of those numbers (all ints were in a 7w range), I'd put FTP at about 185-190, deduct 5 percent and try 2x20 (or 12, or whatever) at 180 or better--see how that goes.  The weekend calls for a 2x12, plus tempo work.

    Not sure I follow your thinking ... why deduct 5%? If you are assuming the power level you did the VO2 intervals 2 was 120% of your FTP, just divide that avg wattage for the intervals by 1.2, and you get your FTP, no? For those of us (currently) in the sub-200 FTP club (I'm @ 198 at the moment), we need every single watt for our self esteem.


  • @ Al-Intervals at 234.  If that's true, 100 percent FTP = approx 185.  My doubts come from the fact that I get a fair amount of anaerobic power on shorter efforts.  (And I'm consoling myself that outdoors, FTP tends to be ten percent higher).  

Sign In or Register to comment.