To supplement or not
Interesting post in NY Times about supplementation. Thoughts? I am admittedly lazy about this stuff and only take a Calcium + D supplement, wit multivitamins thrown in once in a while.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/...s&_r=0
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/...s&_r=0
0
Comments
Here was his summary:
"the volunteers who took the concentrated extracts of vitamins C and E increased their endurance to the same extent as those taking a placebo.
On the other hand, the supplements did not improve performance in comparison with a placebo, so why bother with them, Dr. Paulsen asked."
At to John's point - the study only showed, in this instance, that they were not helpful. We would sure like to know a lot more about the study subjects to see if this is even relevant to us as heavy trainers. I certainly have never considered myself a "recreational" athlete. And if supplementation prevents illness or injury...which impacts consistency...then it is definitely valuable. Unfortunately, these small sample, very brief timeframe, pop studies really don't have much to offer -- which is why they are so often refuted by a study yet to come that tweaks something a little bit.
In addition, I take Fish Oil, a multivitamin, Glucosamine, and a magnesium supplement.