Ironman Lake Tahoe 70.3?
Two races on one course on one day? What will the WTC think of next?
Here is the email I got from the TriClub liaison extolling the virtues of filling the Tahoe course with 70.3 races while an Ironman is taking place....
"Clubbers!
Exciting news – for the first time in North America, IRONMAN is offering both an IRONMAN and IRONMAN 70.3 race on the same day, in the same venue.
IRONMAN 70.3 Lake Tahoe will take place on September 21, 2014 and will be held in conjunction with IRONMAN Lake Tahoe.
IRONMAN 70.3 Lake Tahoe will be a great opportunity to “test drive” the full distance course. Many of you have athletes already scheduled to race the full distance – by adding the 70.3 we believe that we will be able to expand the club presence on site – and build on an already exciting race day!
Like last year, IRONMAN will host food and a beer garden in the TriClub Village. We will begin serving around 3:00 pm, giving your IRONMAN 70.3 teammates plenty of time to head for the showers and then come back to the TriClub Village in Squaw Valley to help us build one of the best cheering, motivation stations on the IRONMAN circuit.
Because your club is local to the Lake Tahoe area, we are pleased to offer your team members priority entry to IRONMAN 70.3 Lake Tahoe."
What do you think?
Comments
Last year with the cold the race was so tough I haven't signed up to do it again. It's a beautiful course, but I really enjoy Big Kahuna which is earlier in September. Should be interesting.
As we all think and see the usual pattern by the WTC as an event that is ready to be closed out.The 70.3 is being put on to fill the field so not so lonely out there and all in one day(financial/contractual obligations?). If they pan a good half field it stay's if not close the book and call it a day.
"Two races in one day" alot of differ races do this. Only WTC IM events has balked at this but it may be the norm in the the future.If they have bottom line numbers they expect, but do not get well let's see how we can get the math to work !
http://www.slowtwitch.com/News/Tahoe_gets_bigger_easier_4292.html
Seems like the race got "easier" as well.... For the record, I am glad I did it last year when it was "hard".
It's too bad for those that want to do it, but Tahoe holds no interest for me -- not because it's hard, but because it is not possible to train for it in Florida:
1) We don't have the topography to practice long climbs. Yeah, I get the Power to Weight ratio concept, but practicing it would help to practice long climbs.
2) In addition to no long climbs, we don't have the opportunity to practice technical descents
3) No opportunity for altitude acclimization
4) No ability to prepare for the possibility of cold weather when training through an extremely hot summer.
That weather last year was a worst case scenario for IMLT. It scared off everyone on the fence about the race.