How to pace a brevet?
This year, in my pursuit of doing cool stuff with my fitness, I'm going to try participating in some brevets. My first, a 200k, will be on April 24th. The next, a 300k, will be two weeks later. I'll assess then whether I want to continue on in this vein, but the distances keep going up! If I want to do Paris-Brest-Paris next year I'll have to pre-qualify this year.
Any experienced randonneurs among us? Any pacing guidance? It's different than an IM in that I don't have to complete that little run after the bike. I want to enjoy the experience and not have a huge recovery period. % of FTP?
0
Comments
I have no brevet experience, hence very little to share in the advice area. But where are you rolling out of? From where to where?
Bill, This has really sparked my interest. I have a friend who's done PBP twice and it's on my list of dream races. I'm also in a have fun with my fitness year.
Anyway, I poked a round the interenet and didn't come up with much regarding pacing except this. epictrain.blogspot.com/2008/01/san-...300km.html He talks about his power numbers for a 300k brevet but nothing about ftp or % of ftp. Maybe you could contact him?
My gut tells me you're still looking at close to IM zones due to the distances. Big difference between the 200k and the 600k though. Gotta keep cut off times in mind too.
Hope you get some responses. Maybe Dan Socie has some knowledge.
@ Matt: thanks for the link. And I think you're right about being close to IM power zones; after all, if I'm too conservative, I can go harder close to the end, right?
This is a Google Group that discusses such craziness.
I just created Chris's post to a link HERE
In my experience, IF of .70 is basically go all day, forever, as long as you are eating and drinking. .75 might not be infinitely doable. Maybe pulls/working with groups at .75-8, then sit in as you can = it all sorts out to .7.
Much different gig, but when Brian Massey and I did our TT down to Oceanside this weekend, I pulled at .85-90. Sitting in slow down for traffic, etc brought me down to .82-83 for a 4.5hrs ride. I was tired, for sure, but not shelled. Plenty of gas, if not motivation, left at the end.
P
Actually it's no different from IM at all. It's all about pace & fueling. I rode 207 miles last year in 10:45 by merely eating consistently and never really riding hard (spiking my power/watts) I did it solo which I think would be easier than a group since the group mentally pushes the pace. As long as you ride within yourself knowing that you'll be on the bike all day you'll be fine.
I know nutrition is a personal thing but what did you eat during that ride? A double century sounds doable this year.
The majority of calories came from gas station food. I reached for high calorie junk food. Snickers, chips, coke. I made a stop at McDonalds at mile 180 - I think. Burgers while tasted great sat in my gut and I probably rode the slowest of the day waiting for those things to process.
Low quality, high calorie food is great for riding. Just make up for it off the bike.
edit: this isn't nutrition. It's fuel
Yep, that's good advice . Seriously though, I don't know if it's because I've gotten lazy now that i'm not IM training or my body has adapted, but it's kinda crazy how long/far I can go on very few calories. I think for my TT with Brian this weekend, I had about 500cals for breakfast and then a total of 500cals on the ride. 4:33 ride time and >3500cals burned. I felt fine.
For me, less is more and I can always fix it with a Coke and/or snickers at a gas station