Elevation Correction: Enable or Disable
Here in Dallas we don't have very many big hills. We have some hills with decent grade, but they aren't very long. I have to actively seek them out on my ride because they aren't just lying around waiting for me to build fitness. As I am getting ready for CDA I'm trying to be mindful of hitting the hills I do have available many times while out on my rides. I don't want to get caught on race day having not done some good hill work in the prep phase.
That begin said - I've noticed that the difference in elevation between the Garmin "enabled" & "disabled" is pretty big. Frankly I don't care which one is right...I just would like to know which one is more right so I know if I'm getting the amount of hill work in that I want. Here are two examples from my 4 1/2 hour ride yesterday and my 3 1/2 hour ride today...those are significant differences in elevation change.
Thoughts?
Comments
David,
I can't answer your question re the Garmin elevation function but I think you're overthinking the issue of total gain on an IM course. Please read this. Notes specific to IMCDA:
The EN Method:
Elevation Correction should be enabled for the most accurate depiction of your ride. Here is the description of Elevation Correction per Garmin Connect:
If I take a ride that is flat as a pancake for 10 miles then climbs to my house at 500' elevation. the Elevation Correction enabled states my gain is 520'. With the Elevation Correction disabled it shows a gain of 1094'.
If you're talking about that first big hill that's inside the base, on the backside of the course (about mile 28 or so) that's about .7mi @ 8%. There is nothing on the CDA course that's greater than 6%.