% FTP target for an Olympic Tri
Feeling pretty good training for IM Chattanooga in late Sept. I have been reading all great insight about how to target the intensity of the IM bike available on the EN website and in the forums.
I am doing an Olympic race in a few weeks. Any idea what % of FTP should be targeted for this shorter distance? Is 90% to aggressive?
0
Comments
That said, as Kim says, everyone is different so you will need to find out what works best for you.
Good luck.
I'm planning on capping my efforts on the climbs/false flats @ 95-105%, hold 90-93% on the level stuff, and just press by feel on the downs. It's hard to nail a target NP around here b/c of the downs. Believe it or not, I can really cook my legs by pushing so hard on the downs trying to keep the watts close to 95% or whatever. That's why I say I'm going to press on the downs but not get caught up with holding 90% on the downs.
BTW, I've asked this same question a few years ago and I received a wide, very wide, range of answers. I ended up shooting for 100% for the 40k. And, I blew up on the run. There are many that can pull that off. I was not one of them. I'm still working on building a consistently strong run so I will back off a touch on the bike, despite it only being an OLY, to give my run a fighting chance.
I know I could not hit 0.90 for 40k. Like other races you need to account for how long it will take you to ride the course. Also factor in that you will have just done a hard swim. Short course racing is intense - no such thing as "only an Oly". At my most recent sprint I rode 0.90 for 37 minutes. That was about as hard as I could go. I was holding hardly anything back for the run. I would likely be targeting around 0.85 for an Olympic that might take me 1hr 20min.
But, if you are a strong swimmer and get out the water in really good shape and you are an axe on the bike, then you could probably do 0.9 or above.
Or you could just forget about it, ride hard, see what you get and use it as a reference for your next short-course race.
I tried the all-out approach with a sprint and was around 100%. The run was FUGLY. I planned on that going in since my run generally sucks so I figured "how much worse could it get?" LOL I found out! I would say it slowed my run down by about 3 mins for the 5k. Next sprint I'll pull back on the bike a bit if I'm looking for a good overall race vs. just a kick-ass bike split.
My race will be very hilly as well. Chris, my 6/28 is also a hilly course. any coincidence you are doing Stamford Ct?
Chattanooga.
But I'll keep you mind the morning of the 28th. Sounds like we'll have similar concerns and approaches.
I'll send you some mojo as we set our transititions up!
Chris and Ken, It would be awesome if you guys returned here to give feedback on how the races went
Hope to see you there in 2 weeks. If you have any more questions, let me know!
Thanks for the course review. Look forward to seeing you.
Given the downhill 2nd half that is a great way to think about it.
That is a great observation, to do well in the Olympic you need a great swim, but taken to far and blowing up on the swim is a disaster. I have been fortunate enough to have experienced both!
for me, it is hard to know until it is to late. On the bike we have the power meter to guide us.
recover (but not too long) in transition, then run like hell
{crickets..}
power meter never fired up and I had to race by RPE. Raced well, too. But, that makes my follow up on how to target IF during a short course rather irrelevant here.
Sorry, maybe next time.
Maybe Ken has something to follow up with.
Really annoying as seems 100x more dangerous to race bikes in rain than to swim in rain. As a result, I got nothing to share except how bummed out I am about the weather in the New York area this past weekend