IS INSIDETRACKER WORTH IT?
Has anybody in the team worked with InsideTracker (EN partner)????? .... What they sell: "Optimize your body's performance. Sophisticated, science based blood analytics, tailored just for you. Get your personalized nutrition and lifestyle recommendations. Trusted by athletes & health conscious consumers worldwide" . www.insidetracker.com
IS IT WORTH IT?
IS IT WORTH IT?
0
Comments
http://www.livescience.com/48868-inside-tracker-review.html
I personally have seen significant improvements in my health that relates to my performance
Blog: http://www.endurancenation.us/blog/uncategorized/insidetracker/
Cant seem to find his video or podcast right now but worth a talk. Ask for Jonathan at Inside Tracker and let him know you're an EN ambassador
Labs derive their ranges from bell curve averages from everyone they test yearly. Because most people are NOT very health(especially a high percentage of those getting labs done), the ranges are very wide, and in no way represent the "optimal" range. Lab ranges are good for picking up outright disease processes, but cause a LOT of people to remain chronically sick because they're told "everything is normal"
Just ONE example (I use this because about 1/3 of my practice is unresolved/undiagnosed thyroid problems) is with "TSH" or thyroid stimulating hormone. The usual lab range is about 0.5 to 5.0, but the functional or optimal range is 1.8 to 3.0....hence there are an estimated 20 million people in the U.S. who suffer with a thyroid problem because they've been mistakenly told "everything is OK".
So could a otherwise "healthy" athlete have subtle metabolic issues (anemias, deficiencies, thyroid dysfunction including autoimmune or "hashimoto's) that could be missed by the MD who is GREAT at picking up big problems, but has no training in and is unfamiliar with functional lab ranges? Well I can tell you it happens ALL the time with the non-athletes......and as far as I know us athletes are made up of the same parts as our non-athlete friends
Thank you all for your comments. I used them to ask a couple questions to the InsideTracker team and this FYI (if interested) was their response:
"There’s a difference between near disease rates, and pursuing what might be an advantage to the athletes. We steer clear of any disease related markers, which is why thyroid is not included in our program. Our program relies on these highly individualized ranges (of nutrient and hormone levels related to health and performance), rather than the lab’s “normal” values. As you’ve seen from your account, we show you the normal (yellow) range, and then the smaller green “optimal” range is based on you as an athlete. It’s made up of height/weight/age/gender and most importantly activity level.
Juan, curious why you are looking at this. Do you think it could be a tiny improvement to your performance, or are you experiencing a specific issue/complaint (besides that whole scary seizure business), or just something cool to do. If something is not feeling right, I'd say maximize the sleeping and nutrition, and if you still feel crappy, maybe then look into further diagnostics? And obviously budget factors in a lot too- if you have the $$ and this sounds like something cool, that is very different than me who struggles to pay copays for medically necessary tests, so you can probalby see where some of the skepticism is coming from as well!