Home General Training Discussions

Wahoo Kickr Analysis - Not As Accurate Below 200 watts

Interesting post on the Google Wattage Forum talking about a research paper looking at the Wahoo Kickr accuracy.  The paper is here:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sam_Shi_Xuan_Wu/publication/296056729_Validity_of_Power_Settings_of_the_Wahoo_KICKR_Power_Trainer/links/57183a9008ae30c3f9f17961.pdf

The conclusion:   Conclusion: When compared to a CALRIG, the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer has acceptable accuracy reporting a small mean bias and narrow limits of agreement in the measurement of power output between 250-700W at cadences of 80-120rpm. Caution should be applied by coaches and sports scientists when using the KICKR at power outputs of <200W and >750W due to the greater variability in recorded power.

 

Comments

  • I saw that.    potential issue for folks pushing less than that.         reinforces considering comparing your crank power device to the Kickr.

  • that is interesting stuff - thanks for sharing
  • Digging deep. it seems to be an issue with cadence. E.G., "Figure 2 shows a small mean bias of 0.8% between the KICKR and the CALRIG at the lower ranges of power (150-200W) at a cadence of 80rpm,"

    Specifically, @ a cadence of 80, pushing 150 watts, there is an error of 0.3%. My usual riding on a KICKR occurs between 150 and 250 watts. And, the higher the watts, the faster I am pedaling, in the range of 77-94. @ 250 watts, cadence of 90, the error is 0.6%. Looks like Wahoo set it up right just for my sweet spot.

Sign In or Register to comment.