What’s Old is New Again (Pro Qualifying for World Champs)
Seems like WTC regrets the change to the points system...and are back to the “win and you are in” approach from years past. There are some nuances, or course, but curious to hear what you think!!
http://www.triathlete.com/2017/12/ironman/ironman-overhauls-pro-qualification-system_309698
http://www.triathlete.com/2017/12/ironman/ironman-overhauls-pro-qualification-system_309698
0
Comments
However, this new system doesn't necessarily reduce the amount of racing one of those journeymen might end up doing. It's basically "win or go home", with 2nd or 3rd qualifying in *some* races. So a lot of pros will still find themselves in a game of Kona musical chairs, trying to pick the right race, and gearing up for another within a month if they fail at the first one.
But why create separate qualifying systems for IM and 70.3? That seems like a compromise to appease the main arguments on gender equality. You want an equal ratio of slots? 70.3 has 85 fixed slots for each gender. You want a system that better reflects the actual pro numbers? IM has fixed and floater slots. I suppose if the main goal is to protect your brand, then WTC tried to find middle ground
I'm surprised by the lack of reaction from the pros though; haven't seen much on Twitter or other media; journalists should have included their comments in the articles. There's clearly an outspoken side of TriEqual/5Q that isn't happy with this change because it doesn't give them the one thing they want. Maybe that keeps pros from commenting. I'd really like to know what they think