Pacing a 70.3 bike leg as a relay team member
I'm doing the bike leg of 70.3 Santa Cruz on Sept. as a relay team member. I'd love some input on what IF/TSS to target for the bike since I'm not running afterward.
Thanks,
John
Thanks,
John
Tagged:
0
Comments
Answers to some of the above "might" change some of what I'm about to say, but...
If I were doing the bike leg of a 70.3, I'd make sure that I could have a warm-up ride prior to the race. Be riding easy-ish ~20 mins as the swim leg is starting with a couple ~60-120s intervals at or near FTP. Then I'd rack the bike like ~10-20 mins after the swim start (I did the bike leg of Challenge AC Relay a few yrs ago and had my road bike in my car because we had to have our bike racked before the race... So I warmed up on my road bike, then threw handed it off to our runner to go stash in my car as I went to the hand-off coral).
Then I'd try to dial in 0.80-0.85 IF for the first hour and crank it up a little bit each ~15 mins after that... If you have anything left once you're ~40 miles in, spend it all in the last 30-40 mins... It's REALLY hard to ride north of 85% for ~2.5 hours... It is possible, but just really hard. You should be TRASHED when you finish that ride. But, I also recommend (after laying on the ground panting for 3-5 mins) doing a ~1-2 mile easy brick run just to see what it's like to run after that type of effort and also to flush out your legs.
Also, don't worry about VI. When you have to run afterwards, you want to ride super steady and smooth to save your legs... In a pure bike TT, the fastest way around the course is likely to hammer up the hills and take really short recoveries after you're up to speed coming down the other side.
@John Withrow I'll try to answer some of your questions. No, the course has some rollers, but basically runs up and back on Hwy 1 along the coast. Total elevation gain is 2,284 ft. Here's the link to the bike course profile. My current FTP is ~290 on my road bike (most recent test). It should be ~12W less on the tri bike. I'll be testing again on the tri bike next week, so I'll have a better sense. At race weight (155 lbs) that puts me at ~3.95W/Kg @ FTP. Everyone's definition of "hard" is different, but I did several race sim rides for 70.3 CdA in the 0.81 - 0.83 IF range and was able to run well off of that, so I'm thinking I could go a bit harder than that if I'm not worried about having to run afterward.
I'm planning to use BestBikeSplit for this course like I did for 70.3 CdA. For that race, I capped the max power at 95% of FTP to minimize VI, but in this case, I may go with the 'default' BBS value (120% of FTP). I "pre-rode" the CdA course several times by downloading the BBS profile into Zwift, so I may do the same again for this race and see how it feels.
From what both of you are saying, it sounds like a good starting point for the BBS model might be 0.86 IF with a max power of 120% of FTP. This race plan gives a TSS of 181. If this sounds reasonable, I may ride it this week in Zwift and adjust up/down based on how it feels. Here's the race profile in BBS:
bestbikesplit.com/public/105178
Thanks,
John
- You want have to swim first and run after
- And you get periodic recoveries of various lengths while going downhill?
Based on my own experience doing numerous rides in the mountains which have around 2.5 hours of actual work, I can "comfortably" hold 0.85, and can work up to 0.89 for 45 minutes to an hour within such a ride. So I think your choice of 0.86 is a good starting place, and I would agree with Paul that you can probably do 0.88 for two hours, assuming you are willing to fall puking off the bike at the end. And who cares what the TSS is? At least during the ride...Climbing time
Flat time
Downhill time
have you added the stravistix extension yet so you can geek out on strava data?
Not certain if you're staying at dream inn (host hotel), but if you are, enjoy the poolside taco stand overlooking the beach after you're done biking.
I'm a firm believer that all things happen for a reason, so after the initial disappointment, I'm over it now. I guess it's time to start the outseason a little earlier than planned. I need to pick a few races for next season.
(BTW, the shoes I am testing are: Vaporfly 4%, Kinvara, Hoka Cavu, and Saucony Type A8 (racing flats). In another weeks, I'll have two data points for each to share.)
@Al Truscott yes, there are a few sprints/oly's in the area through the end of September that I can drop into. I may try to drop one or two into the calendar for fun. BTW- nice analysis on the shoes!