Would it help to take the zeros out of real-time power watts, during an IM race, to simulate norm po
I'm racing IM FL this November 6th 2010, I was wondering if experienced power meter athletes have raced with "taking the zero's out of power watts", to simulate norm power? I heard this during the EN webinar, and I'm wondering if this might be helpful for a mostly flat course? I only tried it on one training ride, but it seemed to work! I'd appreciate any input on this?
0
Comments
Thanks Patrick,
Yea, I guess I already knew that..... just last minute race nerves? I just want to get it right on race day, and not learn later.... that I wish I had done something different! I know & trust my FTP and will plan to ride .70 % of that during my race day. I also realize I need to use RPE & HR information, with live power. Now I just need to execute. Actually, in past IM's I've raced, I'm the odd-ball athlete that has held back too much on the bike (in my opinion), I've always had pretty good runs I just want to improve my bike to my ability and be able to run well also!
Barb, short answer is:
I've actually played with this quite a bit. Flat courses are actually the trickiest in my experience because you're basically pedalling the entire time so it's really no better than AP with zeroes. If you do have a fair amount of variability but no or very little coasting on a flat course (meaning: the highs are too high) then NZAP won't be a good reflection of NP. So, you might think you're riding with a reasonable NP but you're not.
Honestly, I've found that NZAP works much better on hilly courses than flat ones but that's because AP with zeros doesn't work at all for hilly courses. Either way, NZAP only works well if you ride well/smart. It doesn't work well if you don't ride well/smart.
Thanks, Chris
This is a very belated reply...... but just a thanks to understanding the value of NZAP for flat vs. hilly courses. It totally makes sense now!