The RIGHT Trainer?
Now that i am entering my first official Outseason, i have dug out my trainer, which is a nice Nashbar branded one. It is magnetic, has an electronic wired controller that lets me set Z1-5 tension and gives readouts of speed, distance, time, power, etc. (wondering how acurate the power readout is)
Ok, while i am writing this i do a little research and the Nashbar trainer is a rebranded elite. confirmed by pulling off the nashbar sticker and finding the elite logo.
what are the marks of a good trainer, bad one? should i be sticking with this one? or is an upgrade reccomended? and if so to what? and why?
0
Comments
Save your $ if your current one works, there are always uses for additional finances
Steve
If you have a power meter and don't need the power output from the trainer then really anything that gives you consistant resistence and works then it'll do the job. Now if you do not have a power meter then a better trainer with more precise or accurate power readings is of course better. (Like computrainer or power beam) But just a simple old cheap mag trainer can work with a power meter that is already on your bike.
DITTO - best investment is to buy something that allows you to see power both inside and outside. Once that is checked off, as Trent says, anything that gives resistance will do the job...............
I get accurate readings from my PT on my CycleOps FT2. I haven't had a problem in the year I've had my PT. Obviously you'll have different indoor and outdoor FTPs, but that's pretty much normal.
Around here, and anywhere worth a grain of salt IMHO, you have to measure against yourself - in the same (or closest as possible) scenario to guage progress.
Scott has nailed it! This is really the key point. Measure against a baseline and work to drive improvement over time.
http://www.computrainer.com/images/quick_release_large.jpg