'SweetSpot' Ride vs 2x 20's
Yesterday's route made it tough for my scheduled 2x 20's. According to Coggan/Allen, that sweet spot of .85 IF yields benefits. So, I modified my ride and tried to hold the .85.
3 hr ride, 60 miles, IF .86, VI 1.2.
I know, High VI. But, that's why I couldn't really knock out steady 2x 20's. (Guess I could've hit the pain cave)
I'm pretty good about sticking to these schedules, and don't plan on rationalizing/justifying my own changes, but yesterday was a detour from the plan. My question is...
Did I gain something from the Sweet Spot ride as opposed to the 2x 20's? ( I think so.) Did I waste a day of training? (I don't think so.)
Note that I ran pretty strong for 30' immediately after the ride.
Thx!
0
Comments
Also note that our Sunday ABP rides are written to take advantage of this sweet spot training.
Happy Dad Day to ya.
Chris: What Tucker said. I'm solidly in the "informal interval" camp. I do intervals, whether at FTP or 85% but usually FTP according to terrain, not time. The mountains and roads within a 40 mile radius of my house are dotted with little historical PR's (Pnorm, IF, time, etc) of performances I've done in the past and use these to benchmark myself. Short answer is to get in as much FTP work, as you can stand, in whatever manner works best for you and then your default riding gear around that is ABP, 80-85%. What we, as EN athletes, very rarely do on purpose is ride below 80% unless it's a warm up or cool down. The rest of the tri world feels that magical stuff happens as this low intensity, and it can have some benefits for Ironman athletes but there's certainly no "need" to spend any long amounts of time there, especially as a short course/HIM athlete.
Yes, fine to do that Sunday ride as ABP. The best training events for you to do, week after week, now through the end of time are:
After years of training like this, I litterally can not ride my bike easier than 75%. Drives me nuts, voices in my head say "wasting time, wasting time, wasting time!!!"