Garmin 705 and PowerTap
I have the Garmin 705 and a wireless powertap wheel.
Today I noticed that I'm a firmware verstion behind. I have 3.1 and there is (and has been) a 3.3. There are a couple of nice-sounding features listed in the version history. However, I also know there have been "lemon" firmware versions from time to time, especially regarding power recording. So if it ain't broke....
Does anybody know the "wisdom" about Garmin 3.1 vs 3.3 firmwear on the Edge 705? Thanks!
0
Comments
I've been using 3.3 without any issues since it was released (knock on wood). There are reports of other people having problems in the Garmin forums. It looks like your A race is far enough away to give it a try. I believe it wipes your settings, so get a good look at what you've got on your data fileds etc.
Worse comes to worst, I've got the 3.1 firmware that I can send you if you need to downgrade back.
Good luck.
Of course it could be one of the bad Garmin dropout problems too.... hope not!
Wm
Friend had the same problem after the update. I believe he went to bike profile and unchecked cadence and power and all was good.
It sounds like you're saying that you told the Garmin that you didn't have those things and then everything was fixed? Strange!
I am going to do my first ride with the 3.3 firmware today. I haven't changed any of the settings from my 3.1 firmware, which (on the bike profile) have both the cadence and power checked and a custom wheel size. (2093 mm)
I had set custom wheel size a while back when I kept getting notices that automatic wheel size calculations were being done and once in a while got odd speed/distances. That all stopped. Anyway, we'll see how it goes!
I have the luxury of having a FR 310xt as well, and I took it along as a double check.
Both instruments came out reading the same distance and average speed. There is a slight difference in the average power, but I use the 310xt on the bike so little, this may have something to do with autopausing or averaging zeros that I have lost track of. In any case, the difference is just 3 W, so it's clearly not a big deal. It appears that everything is hunky-dory.
Incidentally, the total ascent is ridiculously high on the 310xt. According to Garmin Connect, total ascent is ~700 feet using 310xt and "elevation corrections". I get 1100 feet raw on the 705 and 2300 feet on the 310xt.
Because the course has lots of very small "hills", I wouldn't be surprised if the 1100 figure is closer to correct than the 700 ft figure (given that they probably don't have data every 10 feet or whatever on the road), but it is interesting to see that the GPS and barometric methods give SUCH different values for climbing.
Apparently I did not communicate effectively, my apologies.
If you have speed/distance anomalies, it's probably due to a auto-wheel size not being calculated correctly, so you can specify a wheel size or bypass the auto-wheel size altogether by unchecking those boxes.
So, IF you have speed/distance errors, THEN try unchecking those boxes, it will force the 705 to use GPS for speed and distance. IF you use a custom wheel size, THEN you should could check the boxes because you specifically know how to put the data in that is required by checking those boxes.