Adding a 3rd 6hr bike?
doing my 8th IM at IM LOU
Did my 1st RR last weekend. (not great watts....)
Considering doing another 6hr Bike (with a short run....1-2 miles) this weekend to make a 3rd 6hr ride in the schedule. Another RR is scheduling in 2 more weeks.
I have never run well during the IMs in the past, so trying to mix things up alittle to see if this could help my performance.
Thoughts?
0
Comments
At this point I think it's valuable to accummulate time at race intensity and in your race position, if you have the resources to make that happen.
That said, if you do the MS stuff and then "just" add time on the back end...pretty sure you're gonna be well north of 300 TSS for a 6hr ride. If it were me, I'd say "I'm gonna ride 6hrs," make 70-75% time your priority, then do any extra credit Z3-4 stuff in the second half of the ride, as you feel like it.
Given the heat you're having, I'd also consider running before the bike, 30-40', vs off the bike. I'm sure you're getting more than enough heat training in ALL of your session.
Short story, a 6hr >300 TSS ride, in the heat, followed by a run at 12-1pm in crazy heat could likely significantly impact your downstream session.
I think this is a really good suggestion. When I started doing longer distances I had a lot of trouble running comfortably off the bike without severe back pain. I did something very similar a couple of times during my training and it really helped a lot (more than just a normal single brick). I never really understood why to be honest, but I was happy with the results!
I'm a big believer in the non-existance of special run-off-the-bike fitness. That is, running frequently off the bike is really just a frequent opportunity to practice running slowly, probably with compromised form, and remind yourself, frequently, what it feels like to hit yourself in the head with a hammer by hitting yourself in the head with a hammer, frequently.
It's also common for athletes to think that the answer to a perceived racing problem is a fitness solution, when in fact the more efficient answer is to be found in learning how to race better.
When I think of young Doc Johnson, I think:
At this point in your training, the better, more time efficient solution is to add running frequency = running volume and wrap your head around racing as ninja-esque as you can, especially learning the details of Matt's pacing tool.
@Rich...
1st, thanks for using "young"....even though Im graduating to the 50-54y/o age group (WTC age)
2nd, yes I did use a 11-23 1st year, but had a 12-25 last year....helped alot (no big watts)
3rd, my VI of 1.16 sucked.....caused me to be on course too long (I had a 6:16 bike split and my 2 RR rides were 6:03 and 5:43 before, so actually had my longest time bike ride of year on race day....I suspect that played a part (Matt S had a VI <1.05 last year, this is my goal. I was able to do VI of 1.06 at IMKS on a very similar course this year. I'm finally learning to time trial....god i hope)</p>
4th, yes, the HEAT here is really killing us. I've resorted to most of my run at the YMCA. Todays ride I started at 0615 at 84F and it was 103F when I was done. I just cant start earlier......that's sunrise
Thx "Young" Doc Johnson
Can't start earlier 'cause that's sunrise? Ever heard of a headlamp?
As a brevet rider when the temps are high I do most of my riding at night; the headlamp allows me to read my cue sheet and instrumentation.
@Bill
I don't trust the hillbillies around here already!!