Home Races & Places 🏁⛺

CIM Marathon - DNF Advice

Hello!

 

I raced CIM on Sunday and DNF'd.  I'm not exactly sure why I failed.  I could use some insight.  This was my 3rd marathon, but the 1st where I really strove to go fast.  Was my weekly mileage not enough?  Too agressive of pace?  Nutrition off?

 

I 5K tested with a 45 VDOT a few weeks before the race so I figured 3:45 was doable.  Plus I'd been able to hold 8:37 for one of my 18 mile long runs.  I thought I could push it after rest and taper.  I realize that I missed a long run due to illness and also never went over 18 miles on any long run.  Maybe that was part of the problem.  I suppose I still struggle with picking the right pace for marathons.  On my other 2 marathons, I also had to slow down considerably late in the race.

 

 

Pre Race Routine: 



Day before, had an early dinner at Olive Garden. Ate spaghetti and meatballs, bread, and water. Had some chocolate cake at my brothers house later that night, around 8pm.



Went to bed around 9:30pm so really only got about 6 hours of sleep, but that felt like enough. 



Got up and ate a couple of bananas and a protein shake. Drank a bottle of G2. I had about 550 cals total. Stopped drinking anything at 4pm. Got dressed, checked all my stuff and took off for the race around 4:45. 

 


Event Warmup:



Got to event by 6:15. Had enough time to go to the portapotty and then 20 min warmup with 3 strides.

 

Race:



Tried to run the frist 5 miles at 8:50 pace, then from 6 to 20 run at 8:30. After that goal was to be at 8:35, but didn't make it to that point. 



As far as nutrition. Drank 125 cals of G2 just before start. Ate 3 GUs, 1 every 45 minutes and 2 nuun tablets in my water bottle. Total was about 450 calories from start till I stopped 3 hours later. So that's roughly 150 cals/hour. Not enough? 







Splits 

1 08:43.6 

2 08:51.3 

3 08:49.1 

4 08:50.6 

5 08:51.3 

6 08:34.3 

7 08:27.9 

8 08:29.6 

9 08:32.1 

10 08:27.7 

11 08:30.9 

12 08:28.5 

13 08:31.1 

14 08:30.6 

15 08:31.0 

16 08:30.0 

17 08:32.9 

18 08:36.1 

19 08:32.0 

20 09:18.9 





I started training for this about 3 weeks after Ironman was done. I did the Vineman at the end of July.  I did not go hard on my first runs.  Eased into any hard paces. Followed FIRST running plan so 3 runs per week (1 repeat session, 1 tempo, and 1 long run) and 2 cross-training days. Below are my long runs (with paces) and total weekly mileage. 





LongRun | AvgPace | Total 

10 | 8:40 | 31 

15 | 8:35 | 19 

13 | 7:50 | 20 

13 | 9:00 | 19 

7 | 9:25 | 20 

9 | 9:34 | 27 

13 | 9:44 | 31 

18 | 8:52 | 27 

0 | 0 | 6 

15 | 9:06 | 23 

17 | 9:37 | 14 

10 | 9:17 | 30 

18 | 8:37 | 10 

12 | 8:45 | 26 

8 | 8:10 | 23 

 

Thanks for any advice!

 

Enrique

 

Comments

  • Why didn't you finish (i.e. why did you feel the need to stop racing at mile 21)? That would be helpful information. Were you in pain? Did you have a medical issue? Considering you were hitting your paces for the first 19 miles and only slowing down slightly at mile 20, the information about why you completely stopped will be helpful.

  • how about info on weekly mileage over the last few months. Not sure why you stopped after running a 9:18 mile. How many times have you run 18 miles leading up to the race?
  • As with what others have said - why did you drop?

    150 cals/hour can be low. Why that low? How did your stomach feel?
  • Hi,

    Here are some answers to your questions and thanks for helping.

    What happened was that at during mile 20, I started to feel some fatigue and tightness in my thighs. Eventually, it became a tightness that I've not felt before on any run before. That tightness started to feel like heaviness and by the time I was starting mile 21, my legs were too heavy to even lift any more and I had to stop. I could not even manage a jog. Walking was possible but slow and labored with thighs hurting and tight. I knew I couldn't run anymore and any attempt to finish would be a slow march with some labored jogging. I decided to just call it a day and save my legs for another time.

    Regarding the 150 cals/hour... my stomach was a little sloshy sometime after 10 miles so I started cutting back on the H20. Other than that, my stomach felt fine. One thing that threw me off for this race was the lack of G2 on the course. I trained with it and was used to it and a couple days before, I realized that G2 wasn't offered. I had to rely on Gels which I never do in training. So I took 1 every 45 minutes or so. I'm not sure if this was part of my problem (i.e. not enough calories).

    As for my mileage, I posted at the bottom of my original post. Due to schedule conflicts I was never able to get a long run above 18 miles. There was supposed to be a 20 miler and a 21 miler, but had to cut those to the 18's. I did get 2 x 18 milers and one x 17 that should have been 18, but ran out of time that day and cut it short 1 mile.

    So what do you think?



  • First of all, sorry to hear about the DNF. Good to hear you’ve got a good attitude about it and are looking to troubleshoot.

    Usually answering questions like this is a slam dunk. You look at the person's VDOT (usually derived from a 5k, or maybe 10k), see that they then plugged that into a calculator and it said they could run X, so they try to run X and KABOOM.

     

    Fortunately, you didn't do that (kudos!) - you backed off from what the calculators "predicted" (and even seemed to back off quite a bit). But although it's a little more nuanced in your case, it's still pretty much the same root issue - you didn't back off the predictions *enough*.

     

    So short answer – you ran too fast.

     

    Medium length answer? You ran too fast given that you probably didn't run enough miles for the calculator to be more accurate. Also, cross training can only buy you so much, especially in a standalone marathon (and it works better for some than others).

     

    Long (ok, really long) answer? Read on.

     

    But first read this:


     

    I don't think that article is perfect or scientific, but it's a good start and has been eerily accurate in my experience (and the experience of others). One problem is that it comes from a time when people thought volume alone was by far the best way to success with the marathon - I think it's reasonable to say you can substitute intensity for some of the miles. Another problem is that there are outliers that can get away with less mileage and still come close to the calculators. Also, it also doesn't try factor in cross training (like FIRST) - which works great for some people and not so great for others.

     

    But what it does do is give you an idea of how the calculators work, and what might have happened in your case.

     

    Now just about everyone knows that the Marathon calculators/equivalency predictors/whatever assume “adequate training for the Marathon distance”. You know this too, which is why you backed off from what the calculators predicted.

     

    What most people don’t realize is just how much “adequately training” means. Which is what the above article talks about.

     

    So let’s do some digging.

     

    Let’s do some quick calculations (I am basing these off this spreadsheet – online calculators should give similar results):


     

    You said a VDOT of 45.

    So let’s say a 5k time of 21:48

    Which is a 10k of 45:27

    And a HM of 1:40:17

    And a Marathon of 3:29:05

     

    So divide 3:29:05/0:45:27 – you get a multiplier of 4.6

     

    So that calculator is using 10k * 4.6 to “predict” your Marathon time.

     

    You backed that off to 3:45:00

     

    So divide 3:45:00/0:45:27 – you get a multiplier of 4.95

     

    Now look at the chart in that article:

    30-35mpw: 5.5 

    40mpw: 5.0-5.3 

    55mpw: 4.9 

    60mpw: 4.75-4.85 

    70mpw: 4.70-4.80 

    80-100mpw: 4.55-4.65

     

    So even though you backed off 16 minutes from what the calculator predicted, you still ended up with a pace that assumed you had been averaging about 55mpw when, in reality, you had been averaging 35mpw.

     

    Had you used the 30-35mpw multiplier of 5.5 instead:

    0:45:27*5.5 = 4:09:59

     

    Now I admit that seems crazy high (and maybe it is, especially given cross training, etc.), but even if you were “generous” and went with 5.1, that’s still 3:51:48

     

    As an aside, you also exacerbating things by running a bit faster still than even your chosen 3:45 pace – i.e. a half marathon worth of high 8:2x and low 8:3x miles (which is 3:41-3:43 marathon pace). When you are on a razor’s edge, even a few minutes too fast can push you over.

     

    So, yeah, you ran a bit too fast for your fitness.

     

    Finally, what I’ll close with is that even when I've had a great marathon preparation cycle, with high mileage, long runs, fast finish long runs, tempo work, etc. Miles 20-26.2 JUST PLAIN SUCK. I mean really suck. It's pretty much like a light switch somewhere just before or just after Mile 20 - feeling great, I'm going to kill this, PB here I come, I can taste that beer already and then WHAM. Lead legs, brain making up all sorts of excuses for why I should just quit, why the F did I sign up for this, I’m never doing another one, etc. I don’t think that ever entirely goes away – and while some of it is mind over matter, some of it is definitely training.

     

    The good news? Easy to fix. Do a combination of running a few more miles and/or running a bit slower next time. image I could get into all sorts of other training for the marathon details (important (or not) of long runs, tempo runs, tempo long runs, etc.), but I think I’ve typed enough for now. 
  •   Wow.........Nice fookin' response Craig.  I got nothin'!

  • Craig,

    Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I've never heard about that method of determining a goal pace. I like it because it's relatively easy based on the weekly mileage and a 10K race result. I was having a hard time figuring out what pace I should attempt for CIM. If I'd used this method, I'd have probably chosen something more like 4:00. Oh well, lesson learned!

    So really, unless I increase weekly mileage, the primary way to improve marathon time is to improve speed at smaller distances?

  • Posted By Enrique Pasos on 06 Dec 2011 07:24 PM



    So really, unless I increase weekly mileage, the primary way to improve marathon time is to improve speed at smaller distances?



    @Enrique- Yes, you improve your Marathon time by getting faster at the 1/2 Marathon, You improve your 1/2 mary time by getting faster at the 5K and 10K.  It's not much different than your bike FTP. The higher your FTP the faster you can push the bike.



     

  • Wow. This is really all such great information. I feel so much better equipped to make decisions about goal paces for marathons. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you!
  • It also sounds like that, in addition to going out too fast, you didn't have adequate fuel. If you are going to use the on-course nutrition, you need to know what they'll have including the flavor. I'm not a fan of using only on-course because you can't get enough in at the rest stops. I recommend carrying some. I think 150 calories is too low. Something else to play with during your training. I'd go up 5 - 10 grams of carbohydrates per hour and see how your stomach feels and how your workouts feel. I recommend between 45 and 60 grams of carbs per hour depending on what your body can take down. Also, don't take gels and sports drink at the same time. That can put too much stuff in your stomach that it can't handle.

    Hope all this helps!

  • Penny,

    Good point. Very good point. After you posted this, I started Googling. I think that even if my pace were slower, as it should have been, I may have run out of gas because of that. In training, I was drinking G2 on my long runs and drinking around 30oz per hour. So that would be closer to 200 cals/hour. And usually I took Cliff Blocks with me to chew on when I felt hungry so add some calories there. I definitely was going on less than usual. I need to pay better attention to what's going to be offered at the race. Thanks for mentioning calories.

    I've been doing some research and found this post (link below) by Coach Patrick on Marathon Nation about marathon nutrition protocol. I see from the chart there that I was potentially consuming on the border of what's considered Good/Light and Too Light as far as calories go. Maybe it would have been enough, but I was probably at high risk of running of gas.

    http://www.marathonnation.us/long-run/marathon-nutrition-protocol-for-success/

    Very interesting stuff.
  • Enrique: When I read your post my first thought was that you met Mr. Wall really hard. Meaning you ran out of fuel. The point - learn from it and move forward so you don't make the same mistake again.
  • I've never been on any course that doesn't offer water (altho I've also been on some that run out of it), so I just get used to bringing my own gus/gels and using their water. I would never rely on having a particular sports drink or specific flavor any course.
  • Scott, very good point! Never thought about it that way before. I guess one of the reasons I've stuck with G2 is that it seems less expensive than the Gu Gels. I haven't run the numbers, but Gu Gels just always seem expensive to me when I buy them. But then, I've never priced them out by the box. I have to admit I LOVE the taste of the Vanilla flavor!

  • Posted By Penny Wilson on 08 Dec 2011 03:31 PM

    Enrique: When I read your post my first thought was that you met Mr. Wall really hard. Meaning you ran out of fuel. The point - learn from it and move forward so you don't make the same mistake again.

    Yep. Exactly.  I sooo don't want to make these mistakes again.

  • Just read this thread and was very interested in that I have the same vDOT as you Enrigue. I can hit my 10k and HM vDot paces but not close to my projected Mary time. I too have run 18 miles at 8:3ish pace as well. But those last 8 miles of a Mary are a booger, everyone's enemy. YOu gotta give them alot of respect. I think without a solid 4-5 month marathon only training block - the best time I could shoot for would be 3:53ish. In my best Mary PR (3:57 03/2010) I simply ran at 8:50 pace for as long as I could (which was much longer than any prior Mary) and then my declining pace from there on out was very gradual and controlled - no bomb out. So I agree with others in that you probably went out a little too fast. But you do, you learn, you try again - thats the game we all play. Thanks for sharing.
  • Hi Pete,

    Thanks for the comment. Yeah, I come close to the 10K and HM paces, too. I decided this week after all of this reflection and information that I'm going to end my Tri season in September next year and then focus on the marathon training. I have unfinished business up in Sacramento. DNFing just doesn't sit well with me. CIM in December 2012. image
  • Enrique, I use a calcuation, that falls within Pennys recommended advice above. i do not focus on calories, but rather how many carbs I want to take in an hour. I use 1g of carbs per kg of bodyweight per hour of exercise. I also bring my own stuff with me like Scott does. I am a salty sweater so I need to take sodium in my gels as well, so I have my gels and gatorade and use the aid stations for water. I do run out, but by that time I am close to finishing so I just use what they have on site, but I do check when I sign up for the race to see what they will be using and practice with that in my training runs. I just finished Philly and did a 10 weeks marathon focus block of running 5-6 days a week. My other three marathons I cross trained and I have to say this one was much less painful, well actually only painful the last 2 miles and I would of PB had I not stopped for a pee break, because unlike you i had no time to get in a potty break before the start of the race.
  • Brenda, Thanks for the info. I have a question about your 10 week marathon focus. Did you follow a particular training plan for that? Did it have any cross-training or was it run-only?
  • This is a great thread...thanks to everyone for helping EP! I would also say that the more you run / race over the years, the less you need to rely on miles. IOW I can run a sub-3 marathon on 40 miles/week with bike training included. But that's 10 years after my first marathon and over 30-ish marathons later...In addition to focusing on getting fast in the interim, you'll want to revisit those final 10 weeks to shuffle the totals around to either: (1) get in longer long runs, (2) make the shorter long runs -- sub-13 miles -- harder to count more, or (3) do more miles overall. Thanks for sharing!
  • Thanks Coach P. I will certainly keep that in mind.
Sign In or Register to comment.