IMCdA and Cassette Choice?
Team,
I just changed to an SRM compact crank (50/34..172.5mm) from a standard (53/39) and was wondering your ideas for cassette for IMCdA. I have seen Jenks' Wiki on Compact Cranks (which is killer) and the IM Gearing Standards. This is more of...if you were me, what would you choose?
So, about me...starting 3rd full season of triathlon with no endurance sport background until running in summer 2009. Numerous Sprints, 2 Oly, and 1 HIM. Currently, FTP of 228w and 3.2 w/kg. Will be running Zipp 808's front and rear on my Cervelo P3 at IMCdA.
Thoughts?
0
Comments
@ George I have the same set-up and I will be running either an 11-27 or 28.
I mapped the currently rumored new bike course on "Ride with GPS" here:
http://ridewithgps.com/routes/921247
that route is showing a max grade of 27.1% and quite a few >15%.
as Rich would say, "Mo gears is better"
Paul,
Thanks for mapping the new course. However, 27% is crazy, crazy steep. Hwy 95 is a major major road with lots of traffic and, in my road trippin' experience, don't build those roads steeper than about 8% of they don't have to. I think I'd wait to make the call on how steep the route is until we see reports from locals who are/have ridden it.
That said, 25-12 with a compact is a very good gearing for just about everything, but also nice to have a 26, 27, 28 if you need it.
I hear you all and that was what I thought too. I have found "Mapmyride" to be fairly inaccurate when it comes to elevation data and Ride with GPS to be quite accurate. (supposedly measurements calculated every second as opposed to every 5-10 of map my ride). Having siad that the 27% could be literally for 5-10 feet.
George -- Mapmyride lists the ft gained at 2300
I'd bet that mapmy ride is wrong and not ride with gps
FYI I was kidding; I am hoping that Mapmyride is correct
I have spent the last week since mapping the new route in Ride with GPS, trying to figure out how I go from being a flatlander in coastal SC to being able to climb 10K and then run a marathon ... ... ... in less than 20 weeks.
@ Paul - It's literally all in the execution. Although you may want to take a long bike weekend in NORTH Carolina, wherever it is (Boone?) that's famous as the re-birth place for Lance Armstrong's career, just to test out those execution strategies. But learning how to rein in the watts on the uphills is really the key, not practicing per se all the time on hills. A big bike weekend or two may be the ticket.
George, you're already going up with us some, right ?
I rode IMCDA last year with 11-28. Had plenty of gear at both ends. Also, I just looked at the new bike course map and it has only about half of the total vertical climb as the old course.
tnx all
I am ging up t Boone the weekend of May 10th as my daughter is graduating from App State, I hve a buddy going up ith me that weekend. I am going to make that a long big bike wkend and am planning on the another trip up to do a big weekend out of Greenville. Wiseman when are you all going up?
@Bruce, the elevation gain they give is for one loop of the two-loop course. It has about the same total elevation gain on the course as before. Have heard that some of the climbs are steeper as well, though there are less turns to worry about.
So far, I've seen the course on several sites, including MapMyRide:
http://www.mapmyride.com/s/routes/view/road-cycling-map/idaho/coeur-d039alene/49551254
and Strava:
http://www.strava.com/rides/2012-im-cda-bike-recon-3312267
The course profile looks nearly identical on both sites, but the total elevation gain is different (4600 vs. 5600) and the steepness of the hills (4% vs 6%). IMCdA's official website puts it at 4612 total gain. However, I'm still trying to figure out how IMCdA's site says that each of the two laps has 2306' elevation gain and 2310' of descent. Assuming that you start and end in the same bike transition area, I'm not sure how possible that is. Then again, Google Earth gives different elevations at different points on the surface of Coeur d'Alene Lake, so who knows. Maybe the space-time continuum warps there.
Either way, elevation gain similar to before, and steepness of the hills in the challenging, but not unreasonable range.
I am planning on sticking with a Sram cassette and currently they only make 11-x not 12-x. So I am thinking 11-26...unless you guys tell em differently.