Home General Training Discussions

Watts to kg calculation

How do you do it?  I can't seem to find an answer...

If my FTP is 187 and I'm roughly 125-127 pounds, what is my watts/kg ratio?

Is it as simple as 187/125lbs (whatever that conversion is to kg)?

And there is so much that is dicussed about this-but what is the ideal number to shoot for?  Seems everyone's idea of "ideal watts/kg" varies...

 

Thanks, sorry if this is already somewhere else but I can't find it.

Comments

  • 125 pounds is just shy of 57 kilos.

    watts per kilo = 187 / 57 = 3.3 W/kg

    For most of the talk around here, you'll hear discussions of watts at FTP per kg of body weight, and 4 is considered pretty top notch in triathletes. 3.3 is very solid.

    Bike racers might get interested in W/kg at other power measurements (like 5min power, or 1min power), but these aren't that helpful for us.

    Mike
  • Posted By Lauren McDonald on 23 Mar 2012 10:10 AM

    How do you do it?  I can't seem to find an answer...

    If my FTP is 187 and I'm roughly 125-127 pounds, what is my watts/kg ratio?

    Is it as simple as 187/125lbs (whatever that conversion is to kg)?

    And there is so much that is dicussed about this-but what is the ideal number to shoot for?  Seems everyone's idea of "ideal watts/kg" varies...

     

    Thanks, sorry if this is already somewhere else but I can't find it.

     

    Mike answered your question but here's the math...

    There are 2.2 kilograms in a pound.  Simply divide your weight in pounds by 2.2, so 125/2.2=56.8.  Then divide your watts by your weight in kilos, so 187/56.8=3.29 wats/kg.



     

  • Thanks guys! I probably should've been able to figure that out.
  • Thanks for the question Lauren, I was just trying to figure this one out myself...
  • Once you do the math here is chart you can also use as quick reference. http://www.flammerouge.je/content/3_factsheets/constant/wattkilobench.htm


  • Watts per Kg is a good number to hang on to but is there any age grading of this value? 4 watts/kg might be perfect to aim toward for a 35 y/o doing Ironman but what about the 55, 60, 65 y/o etc. lou Hollander usually wins his age group in the 80y/o and I bet his watts are far lower.
  • @Jeff - needless to say, I've thought about this a bit, and tried to research the question for our three sports. Joe Friel (who, after all, did write a book called Cycling Past 50), asserts that one should reduce expected pace or FTP by 0.5% per year after age 35. There is an article, written by a economist, entitled How Fast Do Old Men Slow Down, which looked at top marathon times by age, and found a lesser drop off, on the range of 0.2% per year. until the early 60s, when things started to go south faster. Another study looked at individuals over time, and followed their 5K (or maybe it was 10K) times from age 19 until ... whenever. They found race times would fall (get faster) from age 19 until about age 29, and then slowly rise, but would not return to the level at age 19 until age 64!

    Finally, I can offer my own experience, FWIW. I do not have data pre age 55, but in my late 50's, I had a w/kg of 4.0 (3.969696...) at my best. In my early 60s, before my accident, I was 3.75, and since then I am struggling to return to 3.5 (currently 3.0, but I'm in my 7th week of OS after three months of not riding.) I can tell a similar tale about my swimming and running, so I feel good about the 0.2% drop off after about age 35-39, and then 0.5% after age 60-62.

    My conclusion is that one should expect solid potential performance up until about age 57, then start to see a progressive deterioration, than maybe a faster fall as one enters Social Security/Medicare age. The interesting thing is, I can still train just as "hard", but the results aren't the same!

    Now I gotta go get on the trainer for today's intervals ...

  • I think the old theory of losing 0.5-1% per year after 35-40 yo is outdated. Al is probably a lot closer in smaller decrements in 40' and 50's increasing in 60's+.

  • Posted By Bob McCallum on 23 Mar 2012 11:56 AM

    There are 2.2 kilograms in a pound.  Simply divide your weight in pounds by 2.2, so 125/2.2=56.8.  Then divide your watts by your weight in kilos, so 187/56.8=3.29 wats/kg.



     

    2.2lbs per kg, not the other way around.

  • Posted By Joel on 28 Mar 2012 08:19 PM
    Posted By Bob McCallum on 23 Mar 2012 11:56 AM

    There are 2.2 kilograms in a pound.  Simply divide your weight in pounds by 2.2, so 125/2.2=56.8.  Then divide your watts by your weight in kilos, so 187/56.8=3.29 wats/kg.



     

    2.2lbs per kg, not the other way around.



    Yes, I wrote it backwards.  I got the math part right. 

  • from the mathametically challenged---my weight stays the same 155, my FTP increases with each test. therefore, my W/KG has gone from 3.5 to 3.7 to 4.0. You want to be lighter and generate more power, correct?? therefore you want this number moving upward??? or am I am completely ass backwards on this stuff..Thanks!
  • Higher w/kg the better.
  • Brian,

    That's correct; decrease weight, increase FTP  and you will see and increase w/kg ratio.

    Gordon

Sign In or Register to comment.