Home General Training Discussions

Aerohelmet - Is there a "threshold" benefit?

I'm debating the benefit of purchasing/using an aerohelmet for racing having used only a road helmet for many years (assuming at least equal comfort and heat dissipation for both). Is the benefit only for the > 3.7 watt/kg folks or would a 6:30 IM bike individual benefit assuming that both can hold a comfortable aero position for the same duration.

What do the experienced folks say - is it worth the purchase for mere mortals?

Thank-you.

 

Comments

  • I have seen charts saying this is one of the highest "$/time improvement" investments you can make. I believe the benefit may be even greater for slower folks who are out on the course for longer.
  • I'm with Matt. Aerodynamics apply to everyone and the longer you're out there the more time benefit you'll get.
  • +1 What Bob and Matt said. This is certainly a very worthwhile purchase, an aero helmet is one of the best 'bang for your bucks'.
  • OK, I'm going to be the contrarian here. While an aero helmet is high bang to the buck, that assumes some level of speed; and the benefits are higher at greater speed (although at lower speeds the lesser benefit is accrued for a longer time). However, a 6.5 hr IM averages to 17.23 mph. I don't think it's worth the investment at this point. And my personal observation is that folks who are less speedy spend less time in the aerobars (pro's are out of the aerobars in an IM less than 5 minutes total). So unless you are already in the bars 99% of the time, I would suggest there is a huge amount of FREE SPEED to gain by getting aero and staying aero. Then get the aero helmet when you drop under 6 hrs -- because you will now that you've joined EN!
  • Paul is right... body position is by FAR the #1 aero thing you can do. By far.

    That said, Matt is right. Aero helmet (especially if you don't go crazy on the cost) is huge bang for buck. AND, the slower you are the bigger the benefit in absolute terms (minutes) but the smaller the benefit in percentage terms. The math works out this way because we all travel the same distance, as opposed to the same amount of time.
  • Posted By William Jenks on 19 Jul 2012 09:24 PM

    Paul is right... body position is by FAR the #1 aero thing you can do. By far.



    That said, Matt is right. Aero helmet (especially if you don't go crazy on the cost) is huge bang for buck. AND, the slower you are the bigger the benefit in absolute terms (minutes) but the smaller the benefit in percentage terms. The math works out this way because we all travel the same distance, as opposed to the same amount of time.



    Man, I love having smart people on the Team!!!  image Thanks william...

  •  Thanks for the feed-back!

  • Posted By Paul Hough on 19 Jul 2012 02:59 PM

    OK, I'm going to be the contrarian here. While an aero helmet is high bang to the buck, that assumes some level of speed; and the benefits are higher at greater speed (although at lower speeds the lesser benefit is accrued for a longer time). However, a 6.5 hr IM averages to 17.23 mph. I don't think it's worth the investment at this point. And my personal observation is that folks who are less speedy spend less time in the aerobars



    Being out of the aerobars is less aero but the benefits of the helmet still stand (more or less) regardless - riding upright with an aero helmet is faster than with a road helmet.  If you want to turn your 6:30 IM bike split into a 6:10-1:15 and are willing to invest $150-200 then I think it definitely worth it.

  • Yes to the aerohelmet, as with other things: regardless of your speed, you need to wear a helmet, have tires in your wheels, tubes inside your tires, bottles on your bike, a singlet, race number, etc. You might as well do due diligence to get the above as aero and slippery as you can.

  • Rich's point makes sense, and while I understand that slower riders get the benefit longer, my understanding is that wind resistance
    Is not linear, so the wind is higher as a total percent of resistance when going from 20 to 21 mph than from 16 to 17 mph, and therefore aero gear is more valuable as a percentage of performance improvement as your speeds increase.
  • Posted By Brett Prince on 23 Jul 2012 08:24 PM

    Rich's point makes sense, and while I understand that slower riders get the benefit longer, my understanding is that wind resistance

    Is not linear, so the wind is higher as a total percent of resistance when going from 20 to 21 mph than from 16 to 17 mph, and therefore aero gear is more valuable as a percentage of performance improvement as your speeds increase.

    @Brett - aerodynamic drag is a function of Velocity squared.  (full equation here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_equation)  So, as your speed increases from 10 to 12, an increase of 20% in speed, the drag you have to overcome is increased 44%.  Going from 20 to 24, however, again a 20% increase in speed yields the same increase in drag of 44%  [22*22 = 576, 20*20 = 400.  (576-400) / 400 = 1.44].

    To use your numbers:

    • 16 --> 17 is an increase of 6.25% in speed, but a 12.9% increase in drag.
    • 20 --> 21 is an increase of only 5% in speed, but a 10.25% increase in drag.

    So, after all that, what do we know.  We know that for a specific percentage increase in speed, the drag increases the same percentage.  However, the difference in absolute drag, overcome by your POWER PRODUCTION, is a much bigger number (since we are starting from a bigger number.....).

    Really simplifying things here, if it takes 200W to go 16mph, the numbers would look like this:

    16 200
    17 226
    18 253
    19 282
    20 313
    21 345



     

    So, 16 to 17 is a larger percentage increase, but a SMALLER absolute number.  20 to 21 is a smaller percentage increase, but a LARGER absolute number.

    I hope I didn't muddy things up.....does this make sense?

  • @Joe, but what color aerohelmet is the fastest?

    Sorry, just sat thru 2.75hrs of the Dark Knight. I gots nothin' til mornin'

  • Pink, of course.





     

  • If it helps, I've got two aero helmets in the discard pile in the closet that are perfectly good. Raced with each for 1-season, but never liked the fit of either. One is a Giro and the other is Garneau. Happy to send them along to you for a demo. FWIW, I like the fit of the Rudy Project much better. Road helmet fit doesn't seem to vary much, but the ear covers on the aero helmets are very different. After 6+ hours on the bike, having those things dig into your ears can be very annoying.

    I don't wear my aero helmet above 80F for an IM. I think any aero benefit is offset by heat retention/brain cooking so that you pay back the 5-minutes of aero saving with 20-minutes of dehydration and heat exhaustion.
  • I wore an aerohelmet at IMTX last year when temps reached 90 towards the end of the bike. I was fine. My n=1.
Sign In or Register to comment.