OS warning
This is directed at the newer folks in EN.
A lot of more experienced folks are posting their higher volume workouts with bike and run distances and times much more than that recommended for the OS.
Bear in mind that the OS is meant to be done as is, with the exception of working up to a 2.5 hour Saturday bike and a 1.5 hour Sunday run.
So my point is, it can be dangerous to do intensity AND volume. Do not think you are doing anything wrong if you are not posting crazy distance and time volumes . In fact, if you are following the OS as written, you are probably making time efficient gains and not getting hurt. If you are trying to add in volume during the OS, you increase the risk of injury, burnout, overtraining, and regression in your fitness. If you feel the need to add in volume, cut back on the intensity.
I think the coaches and science would back me on this. But feel free to correct me.
A lot of more experienced folks are posting their higher volume workouts with bike and run distances and times much more than that recommended for the OS.
Bear in mind that the OS is meant to be done as is, with the exception of working up to a 2.5 hour Saturday bike and a 1.5 hour Sunday run.
So my point is, it can be dangerous to do intensity AND volume. Do not think you are doing anything wrong if you are not posting crazy distance and time volumes . In fact, if you are following the OS as written, you are probably making time efficient gains and not getting hurt. If you are trying to add in volume during the OS, you increase the risk of injury, burnout, overtraining, and regression in your fitness. If you feel the need to add in volume, cut back on the intensity.
I think the coaches and science would back me on this. But feel free to correct me.
0
Comments
So think about those Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday stretches and those ever growing Saturday FTP intervals before you go on with your overachieving and sneaking in those extra workouts when you should be resting... Heh heh heh...
I am hitting the Bike wko's harder than my FTP number because I feel that I tested well below my real FTP due to the new protocol for testing. My VO2 test was 308, but my FTP netted out at 235. If I take the 308 as my Z5 then my real FTP should have been closer to 245-250 Z4. So I have adjusted my FTP to reflect those numbers. I know my bump up will be closer to where I'm training at now for my FTP wko's. My goal is to have a stronger bike up at IMMT.
PS, Canada banned the penny last week now they are nickeling and diming us.
Thats my 2 cents. (May only be worth 1 cent
* my apologies for any medical professionals offended by this example!
@ Helen - I did the beginner plan for 2 season and saw great results. The second OS was because I took so much time off and still saw good improvement. It's not an easy plan by any means.
Gordon
Oh and uh, Honey Badger is as Honey Badger does... ;-)
As for posting workouts, it's fine to broadcast your accomplishments. It's another thing to brag like your better than everyone else.
I suspect there are lurkers who routinely read the Bike and Run threads even if they don't post much.
Carrie and I are making an effort to keep the JOS forums positive and helpfu on this end...but if folks have suggestions on how to make them better or more more helpful, please don't hesitate to contact either of us directly.
Trust the tests. Different tests are going to give you different results.
Remember this year we are not doing 8 weeks of FTP followed by 6 weeks of VO2 and then 6 weeks of FTP. We are mixing it all together, hence the reason for a different warm up and different test.
The coaches work hard every year to listen to the feedback of the team on their successes and failures and then adjust the plans accordingly. What perplexes me is why someone would join a team that highlights that their plans are designed for the athlete with less time than the average volume plan calls for and then they add more. Am I the only confused by this?
Thanks for the post Robin. I don't begrudge anyone their big workouts. I read the posts and think, "Man, that's pretty awesome." then go back to doing my own thing. I enjoy reading what other folks are doing, and view their posts as something to shoot for in the future.
I've screwed up several races by trying to race other people, instead of racing to my own capability. I'm sticking to the plan, 'cause that's what I paid for. RnP asked me to trust them -- so I will. Now, if I follow my end of the bargain by doing the training, I expect they will follow their end and get me a satisfactory finish in Mont Tremblant. If not, I will kick them in the nutz.
@ Peter-Thanks for all the quick responses via FB and emails.
The biggest thing I can say is training for two big crit races, and indoor century and doing the OS has been a total blast. Working with EN and my 3 local coaches I have seen tremendous gains!!! We take my OS plan and then they add what they feel I need for attacking purposes during the crit...really pushing and working the neuromuscular area!! I have busted my azz and deserve the gains I have made! I don't think anybody thinks they are better then anybody else.
I also wanted to note I have stayed under 11 hours for the OS by adding the extra each week.
Looking ahead it looks like I might hit 12-12.5 hours once or twice but that's it.
I have been very open and made it clear I was working more then what the OS had so others would know why and know it was up and beyond our prescribed wko's!! I have answered several emails and even phone calls. Several join us via google circles for our workouts and some fun long distance friendships have been made.
I hope I have not offended anyone but with so many personalities that's probably impossible not to do.
In closing I just want you to know I will continue to bust my azz, follow my plans as written by my coaches. To this point I have yet to over achieve or workout above the plans written for me. I don't answer to anyone but The Lord above!!! If you should have any questions please ask away.
Thanks