Rappstar not showing EN the love...
Interesting thread over on ST, talking about the latest article against bricks.
http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum....ply;so=ASC
I was floored that so many of the old timers basically chimed in in agreement. Then, along came Jordan, whose opinion I usually respect. However, I think he went too far here. What happened, Rich, did you kick him in the nuts once back in the day?
Ah, Endurance Nation. Never be afraid to give bad advice based on poor anecdotal evidence. First, they advise no swimming in the offseason. Now, no bricks.
If you want to read a REALLY interesting article on the PRECISE value of brick workouts - and why they are REALLY important - read the AIS study on lower-leg muscle activation during "normal" running vs. running off the bike. Then read the section of the conclusion where they explicitly state that running off the bike in training reduces the time it takes for your body to start firing your lower leg muscles "as normal" (typically, there is some residual carryover where your body is "confused" and still fires the muscles as if you were cycling).
But don't let actual, practical evidence get in the way of what a couple of hack "coaches" (using the term loosely) think.
Of course, rather than reading ANY study at all, you can think about one simple concept - specificity. Running off the bike is specific training for triathlon. Therefore, it is going to make you a better triathlete. But of course, that doesn't get anyone talking about your "articles."
Comments
@Rich, I thought you had asked for data from people last year about their 1000m TT pre and post-OS. Would love it if you had that data and could wipe it in Rapp's nose since it wouldn't be anecdotal. Actually data driven.
If someone can find the study for me I'd be happy to read it and comment on it, over here, not on Slowtwitch. Or maybe, dunno, too busy doing other stuff for you folks like writing, creating season plans, moving the new OS plans into the site here, etc.
But my primary contention is this: the reason why many people underperform on the run is NOT because they haven't done a lot of bricks. Clearly, they have been doing a lot bricks and are still not running well off the bike. The reason is because they are riding too hard or running too fast in the first 6-8 miles of the run.
You only need to stand at mile 1 of any Ironman run course to see this, expecially on a two lap run course. Just stand at mile 1, all day.
You may call it anecdotal...and it is. I call it observation and thinking critically about what the sport says you should do vs how it all actually plays out on race day.
Our method then, of making you faster, is:
Maybe I'll just cut and paste this over to ST and be done with it
It's possible that folks who are at a point where Vdot improvements are very hard to come by might gain some incremental specific benefits from those types of runs, but I just don't think that describes the vast majority of us out here.
Still think you must have knocked his goggles off back at Wildflower or something, Rich!
The "Hacks" must be doing something right to get attacked by such "experts". What exactly is their beef with EN's success?
Why so threatened?
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14658244
I can't figure out how to see the whole study though. Abstract:
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of prior cycling on EMG activity of selected lower leg muscles during running. Ten elite level triathletes underwent two testing sessions at race pace: a 40 km cycle followed by a 2 km run (CR) and a 10 km run followed by a 2 km run (RR). EMG data from selected lower limb muscles were collected at three sections of each run (0 km, 1 km and 2 km) for six strides using a portable data logger. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between condition were found for the level of activation (Lact) for biceps femoris (BF) during stance and vastus lateralis (VL) during flight and stance. Vastus medialis (VM) changed in Lact, during flight, between sections in the 2 km run. Furthermore, significant differences (p < 0.05) between condition were found for BF during stance and for rectus femoris (RF) and VM during flight. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the duration of VL activation (Dact) across sections of the 2 km run. Findings from this investigation highlight changes in muscle function when changing from cycling to running and indicate a need to train specifically for the cycle to run transition. Such training may improve performance and reduce the risk of injury.
And that's how we are/will lay it out on our plans and for you here:
You then, with our help, do the smart guy/gal thing to make our training plan YOUR training plan. And this highlights the potential value of being a member vs a training plan customer.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14763140308522806
I'm just not that interested, since I can predict that they conclude that muscle activation patterns are different (no $h!t) and therefore different training is necessary. Unfortunately, there's no way that they will offer recommendations on what to do (since that wasn't part of the study), and I'm sure that they didn't conduct a follow-up study with two groups to investigate different training methodologies.
The problem with the author's (presumed) conclusion, and that of Jordan, is that the underlying assumption is that just because the activation is different, that it is something that requires training. Put another way, there's an assumption that, if you do brick training, you can get better at it. I'm just not convinced that's true. Just because it's different doesn't mean it's trainable, or that we know the right way to train it.
Therefore, given the time constraints in my life, I'll continue to brick in the OS for time efficiency and change of clothing, but not because I believe that there is some special brick adaptation that triathletes need. Otherwise, I wouldn't have enough time in my life to comment in the forums!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17549464
that suggests that training multiple sports sequentially actually diminishes the training effect, leading to lower muscle recruitment potential. Just in case somebody wants to go pick a fight over on ST. I'm not in the mood.
Fine to represent...but please be polite and respectful.
I will likely cut and paste my stuff above and these abstracts into a post over there tomorrow and be done with it.
Also...I just want to thanks to everyone for helping us create a space where we can all have polite, respectful, valuable conversations about so many topics that we're all interested!
I don't know if the triathlon forum ---> coach relationship has an analog in the real world, with your real jobs, but you probably have an idea of what this stuff can be like for guys like PnI. It's so, so nice and refreshing to have a forum that I actually enjoy coming to and interacting with our athletes and fellow triathletes! If I were a coach without a community and my only resources for talking to other people about the sport were forums owned and managed by other people...I think I would have shot myself years ago. Between CF and EN I've always had my own space where I didn't have to drop my pants and bust out the ruler every day, didn't have to pretend I know everything, encourage people to challenge me, and more importantly relate like an adult with other adults.
-Newbie to the Haus, but in cases like this, sometimes I just think its best to remember
OK, I posted a polite reply, (jayhawk) but had to address Jordan and Paulo......Personally Im glad not everyone loves EN.I don't want all my competition to know what we know. Im all for kicking their ass on raceday!
Meh, I'm with Roy. I mean if you want to blindly follow what others are doing or just have a coach slap something in front of you that's cool. If you want to put a lot of effort into finding what works for you and the "mainstream" ideas work for you then that's great. For the most part the EN plans track with how I have learned I improve best with great ROI. I don't always find everything the EN plan calls for works for me, but I can adjust. When you're self-coached you got no one to blame but yourself (which I think makes you a better athlete). When you blindly follow, well, at least you can bitch and convince yourself that it's not your fault...
EDIT: And I need to remind myself not to look at these ST posts that you guys put up...they are such a downer with all the negativity.
I have little experience reading threads there, but I can say I've read many anti-EN posts, but have never seen anyone say that D3 sucks, or CTS has no idea what they are talking about, or MAO is a sham. Could it be because they are scared?
I especially love the swimming criticisms. I would love to hear any one of those guys give a personal testimonial about how they swam 5 days a week for 5 months last winter and took their IM swim time from 1:07 to 1:02, just to see how many people would think he/she was an idiot when they actually see it in print. Even me putting it in print makes it look idiotic.
So RnP aren't real coaches because they use a "cookie cutter" plan and don't tailor everything and do one-on-one is about as stupid as saying Rappstar isn't a Real Pro because he didn't race Kona.
I expected more from him. Feeling better about yourself by ridiculing others isn't exactly a redeeming character trait, IMHO.
Username in ST-land is phabio...
Oh well - that was fun...